QGenda vs Verisys
Two Credentialing & Provider Data vendors, side by side. Facts from public sources; judgments are ours.
At a glance
Derived from public facts · a rough scale, not a ranking
| QGenda | Verisys | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Subscription (per user or PMPM) · Priced per provider per module | Enterprise contract (custom) · Per-file and subscription components, quoted |
| Speed to go live | Weeks per department; longer enterprise-wide | Standard onboarding project; delegated credentialing takes longer |
| Automation model | Software platform · Rules-based scheduling and credentialing workflows | Tech-enabled service · Data platform plus human CVO staff |
| Built for | Mid-size groups, Enterprise systems | Enterprise systems, Payers |
| Security posture | SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA |
| Company maturity | 20 yrs (est. 2006) | 34 yrs (est. 1992) |
| Financial backing | $51M · Acquired by Hearst (Hearst Health, 2024) | Private equity backed |
| Named customers | 2 named | 1 named |
| Published results | No public numbers | No public numbers |
| Documented integrations | 3 listed | 4 listed |
| Third-party validation | None found | None found |
Bottom line
- Pick QGenda if you want scheduling and credentialing on one provider record across a health system, rather than a standalone credentialing point tool.
- Pick Verisys if you need a large, audit-proven outsourced CVO with its own sanctions database rather than credentialing software to run yourself.
QGenda
Healthcare workforce scheduling with built-in credentialing and enrollment
- Founded
- 2006
- HQ
- Atlanta, GA
- Stage
- Acquired by Hearst (Hearst Health, 2024)
- Raised
- $51M
What it does
- Physician and staff scheduling automation
- Credentialing, privileging, and payer enrollment
- On-call scheduling and clinical communication
- Time and attendance with compensation tracking
- Room and clinical capacity management
- Residency management via New Innovations
Where it's strong
- Scheduling data feeds credentialing and payroll, killing duplicate provider records across systems.
- Deep healthcare specialization: 4,500+ customer organizations across 30+ medical specialties.
- Hearst Health ownership brings stability and adjacent assets like MCG and FDB.
What buyers should weigh
- Credentialing is a newer module than scheduling; standalone credentialing vendors go deeper.
- Per-provider pricing gets expensive as you extend from physicians to nurses and staff.
- Full workforce rollouts across a health system take real change management, not just setup.
Named customers
Nebraska Methodist Health System · MyMichigan Health
Integrations
Verisys
National CVO for provider verification, screening, and monitoring
- Founded
- 1992
- HQ
- Louisville, KY
- Stage
- Private equity backed
- Raised
- n/a
What it does
- Primary source verification for NCQA-accredited credentialing
- FACIS sanctions and exclusions screening database
- Continuous license and OIG exclusion monitoring
- Full outsourced CVO services at national scale
- Provider identity verification with ID.me for Medicaid
- Payer enrollment and network compliance support
Where it's strong
- One of the largest outsourced CVOs, so it handles enterprise volume that smaller shops cannot.
- Owns its own screening database (FACIS) instead of reselling third-party data.
- Long compliance track record with NCQA-oriented processes and ISO certification.
What buyers should weigh
- A 30-year-old services-heavy company, not a modern self-serve software product.
- Multiple acquisitions and rebrands (Aperture, Med Advantage) can mean uneven tooling across product lines.
- Pricing and contracts are enterprise-style and opaque; small groups may find lighter options cheaper.
Named customers
MedCost
Integrations
Compare against the rest of Credentialing & Provider Data
Deciding between these two?
First Pass tracks Credentialing & Provider Data every week: funding, launches, and what changed since this page was written.