Tennr alternatives

5 other Patient Access & Intake vendors, ordered by how they stack up on our scorecard (maturity, backing, proof, implementation, security). Facts from public sources; judgments are ours.

1. 1. Phreesia

   vs Tennr

   Public company powering patient intake and payments

   Pick Phreesia if you want a proven, heavily certified intake and payments layer tied to your EHR and can live with custom quotes and module fees.

   Subscription (per user or PMPM)Software platformSmall practicesMid-size groupsEnterprise systems

2. 2. Clearwave

   vs Tennr

   Self-service registration and eligibility for specialty care

   Pick Clearwave if you're a high-volume specialty practice that wants kiosk and mobile check-in to collect copays and verify insurance before the patient sits down.

   Not publishedSoftware platformMid-size groupsEnterprise systems

3. 3. Luma Health

   vs Tennr

   Patient access, intake, and communication built on the EHR

   Pick Luma if you're a mid-size or enterprise group that wants scheduling, reminders, and patient communication wired deeply into your EHR.

   Subscription (per user or PMPM)Software platformMid-size groupsEnterprise systems

4. 4. pVerify

   vs Tennr

   REST APIs for real-time eligibility and benefits verification

   Pick pVerify if you want to embed accurate, specialty-aware eligibility checks into your own software or intake workflow through an API rather than buy a full RCM platform.

   Per-transaction / per-chartSoftware platformSmall practicesMid-size groupsBilling companies

5. 5. Sohar Health

   vs Tennr

   API-first AI eligibility verification and coverage discovery

   Pick Sohar Health if you are a behavioral health or digital health platform with engineers and want real-time eligibility answers through an API in seconds.

   Not publishedData / network utilityMid-size groupsEnterprise systems