Hyro vs Standard Practice
Two AI Voice & Call Agents vendors, side by side. Facts from public sources; judgments are ours.
At a glance
Derived from public facts · a rough scale, not a ranking
| Hyro | Standard Practice | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Enterprise contract (custom) · quote after discovery, enterprise cycles | Not published |
| Speed to go live | basic bots in days, typical weeks | Sidecar to existing RCM workflow |
| Automation model | Autonomous agents · patient-facing voice and chat agents | Autonomous agents · Agent completes calls like staff |
| Built for | Enterprise systems, Payers | Small practices, Mid-size groups, Billing companies |
| Security posture | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA | HIPAA |
| Company maturity | 8 yrs (est. 2018) | 5 yrs (est. 2021) |
| Financial backing | $95M · Growth (Series C equivalent) | $8.5M · Seed |
| Named customers | 5 named | None public |
| Published results | Specific numbers public | No public numbers |
| Documented integrations | 4 listed | None documented |
| Third-party validation | None found | None found |
Bottom line
- Pick Hyro if your call center drowns in scheduling and FAQ calls and you want healthcare-specific AI agents deflecting them within weeks.
- Pick Standard Practice if your pain is specifically staff time lost to outbound payer and pharmacy phone calls.
Hyro
AI voice and chat agents for health system call centers
- Founded
- 2018
- HQ
- New York, NY
- Stage
- Growth (Series C equivalent)
- Raised
- $95M
What it does
- Voice AI agents for patient access call centers
- Self-service scheduling written back into Epic
- Prescription refill and registration call automation
- Web chat and SMS agents on the same platform
- Call analytics and conversation intelligence for operations
Where it's strong
- Deployed at more than 45 health systems with named flagship customers, unusual depth for this category.
- Reports resolving up to 85% of routine patient interactions and 35-45% contact center cost reduction across its base.
- A customer (Bon Secours Mercy Health) invested in the company, a strong retention signal.
What buyers should weigh
- Focused on patient access and consumer-facing calls, not payer-side calls like prior auth follow-up; it will not replace billing office phone work.
- ROI depends on call volume and Epic integration depth, so smaller groups see less benefit.
- The health system voice AI field is crowding fast, with EHR vendors and contact center platforms adding native agents.
Named customers
Intermountain Health · Bon Secours Mercy Health · Sutter Health · Tampa General Hospital · Hackensack Meridian Health
Integrations
Standard Practice
Voice AI that calls payers so staff do not
- Founded
- 2021
- HQ
- New York, NY
- Stage
- Seed
- Raised
- $8.5M
What it does
- Dials payers, navigates IVR menus, waits on hold
- Benefits and eligibility verification calls
- Prior authorization follow-up
- Claim status and follow-up calls
- Credentialing and EDI enrollment calls
- Responds to payer reps in real time
Where it's strong
- Narrow focus on outbound payer calls means depth in IVR navigation, hold handling, and live rep conversations.
- No inbound call center replacement to configure; it slots beside existing RCM workflows.
- Team has been in healthcare operations since 2021 and pivoted based on direct practice pain.
What buyers should weigh
- No customers or case study results are publicly named.
- Disclosed funding ($8.5M, raised for the prior Nibble Health product) is small next to voice AI rivals.
- Outbound payer calls only; patient-facing calls need another tool.
Compare against the rest of AI Voice & Call Agents
Deciding between these two?
First Pass tracks AI Voice & Call Agents every week: funding, launches, and what changed since this page was written.